How public does a Public Interest Disclosure need to be?

David Reid
David Reid
View Profile

This EAT decision substantially limits the ‘public interest’ test and opens the door to claimants arguing that a disclosure which, perhaps even admittedly, has been primarily motivated by personal considerations, nevertheless satisfies the public interest requirement.

Clearly, claimants will still require to show that they had the interests of a wider grouping in mind when sticking their head above the parapet. But the question now arises as to how large that wider grouping need actually be, to be considered as affecting ‘the public’. In this case, a group of 100 or so managers was held to be sufficient, but we anticipate that this will be a common line of argument for whistleblowing cases of the future.

You can read the case here:

Topics: ,

Enquire about our 12 month employment law retainer

If you would like to speak to one of our solicitors and discuss your requirements in more detail please call 0141 331 5150 or use this contact form.

Any personal information provided to us will be retained and used in accordance with our Privacy Statement

Lauren Wilson red arrowSenior Solicitor
Louise Walker red arrowLegal Director
Caroline Cobain red arrowLegal Director
David McRae red arrowManaging Director
David Reid red arrowDirector
Lucy Brooks red arrowSenior Solicitor
Samer Cheaitou red arrowTrainee Solicitor
Brian Todd red arrowBusiness Development Manager